Mary Christie Institute Mary Christie Institute
  • About Us
    • Our Mission and History
    • Who We Are
      • Leadership
      • Presidents’ Council
      • Our Partners
      • Our Funders
      • National Youth Council
      • Fellows Program
    • News
    • Contact Us
  • Focus Areas
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Sexual Assault and Title IX
    • Substance Use
    • Student Success
    • College Affordability
    • Basic Needs
    • Physical Health
  • Publications
    • MCFeed
    • Quadcast
    • MCI Research and Reports
    • Mary Christie Quarterly

Home  /  Mary Christie Quarterly  /  Maintaining the Mobility Engine

Opinion | College Affordability

Maintaining the Mobility Engine

By: Katherine Newman
January 11, 2019

The importance of public education goes beyond gaining knowledge

The case for state support of public universities has historically rested largely on their contribution to the labor force. And to be sure, that contribution is a valuable one.
But there is growing recognition of the value provided by public higher education institutions as engines of upward mobility, producing middle-class taxpayers who contribute to states’ long-term financial wellbeing.

The latest reflection of this new understanding comes in the most recent rankings by US News and World Report, the holy grail of college and university rankings. In a little-noticed change in its method of assessing graduation, US News added greater weight to economic mobility by measuring the graduation rates of students who received federal Pell grants. Although these grants can go to students from families with incomes of up to $50,000, the lion’s share of them are in households with $40,000 or less in annual earnings.

The Brookings Institution actually quantifies the upward mobility factor by comparing a theoretical post-college income based on family income, ethnicity, first generation status, gender, and academic preparedness, with the income that graduates actually achieve.

The University of Massachusetts Boston is one example of the way in which this analytical trend captures an important measure of an institution’s value—to students and families, state finances and (in the case of UMass Boston since most of its graduates stay in Massachusetts) the regional economy. UMass Boston graduates the highest proportion of first-generation students in the UMass system and the most ethnically diverse student body, even though its students come from families with the lowest median incomes. Ten years after graduation, UMass Boston alumni make approximately the same as their Amherst and Lowell counterparts—$47,000 compared to about $50,000.

In the new US News rankings, UMass Boston, which has the highest proportion of Pell recipient in the UMass system, climbed a dramatic 11 spots. Out of a possible 100 in the Brookings Institution’s scoring, UMass Boston earns a 78, placing it second among Massachusetts public universities, and tied with peers like the University of Illinois at Chicago. This may be one reason why the freshman enrollment at UMass Boston surged this Fall, producing the largest first year class in the university’s history.

Maintaining the nation’s engines of upward mobility depends on the support of state governments. Yet, across the country, state support for higher education is not keeping pace with its cost (or even the low rate of inflation).
Between fiscal 2017 and 2018, the growth of state support slowed to 1.6 percent, with 19 states reporting actual declines in support, according to the Grapevine survey conducted by Illinois State University’s Center for the Study of Education Policy and the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association.

When states step up, families are the big winners. But so are the states themselves when graduates join the ranks of employees and taxpayers. This virtuous cycle is precisely why higher education is the best possible investment in the long-term prosperity of individuals, families and state governments.

Katherine Newman is the Torrey Little Professor of Sociology and Interim Chancellor of UMass Boston.

  • Tags: Opinion

TRENDING

  • 1 UR Well
  • 2 Liberal Education and Everything Everywhere All at Once
  • 3 Physician, Heal Thyself: The increasing levels of stress in medical school
  • 4 Real World Anxiety: Young professionals report poor mental health/burnout
  • 5 FRONTLINES: Interview with Jake Baggott

Related Articles

Mental and Behavioral Health, Basic Needs, College Affordability

Technology Solutions in College Behavioral Health

As colleges and universities struggle with the increasing demand for counseling services, students and administrators alike are looking to technological solutions to address the crisis. Ohio State University launched a counseling mobile app that allows students to make an appointment, access breathing exercises, and contact the clinic in case of…

MCQ. Issue 10
07/10/2018
Student Success, College Affordability

A Difficult Passage

Supporting the unique health needs of community college students Of all of the initiatives aimed at closing America’s opportunity gap, one of the most reliable is — or should be — public higher education. Having established a community college system with an open door admissions policy and subsidized tuition, our…

MCQ. Issue 2
06/01/2016
Mental and Behavioral Health, College Affordability, Physical Health

Physician, Heal Thyself: The increasing levels of stress in medical school

Like drinking from a fire hose. That’s the longstanding analogy used to describe the deluge of information aimed at medical school students studying to become doctors. Medical school has long been synonymous with anxiety and achievement, intense training, and acute pressure. Certainly, graduate work by nature involves hard work and…

MCQ. Issue 26
07/18/2022
Previous Article Next Article
© 2025 Mary Christie Institute. All rights reserved.        Privacy Policy | Terms | CA Terms
×
×
×